70
JVC GD-463D10
$9,153.00
Released September, 2009
The Pros:Extremely slim and attractive bezel. Incredibly thin at only 1.5-inches. Includes two pairs of 3D glasses.
The Cons:Poor value - very expensive for a technology with no media designed for it. Bezel and stand are highly glossy - reflective and finger print magnets. Extremely expensive.
The JVC GD-463D10 is a 46" 3D LCD TV released by JVC in September, 2009. This televsion can be used to display either 3D content or can be used as a normal 1080p HD monitor. It is only 1-1/2" (39mm) thick and uses JVC's unique high-quality 3D visual engine and the Xpol polarizing filter to a natural, flicker-free 3D visual experience, even off-axis.
Loading latest prices from ProductWiki...
Unlike other 3D technologies, JVC GD-463D10 displays both left and right eye images simultaneously eliminating the need to use battery powered 3D strobing glasses, adopting battery-free light polarizing glasses instead; 2 pairs are included with the set. The three HDMI inputs are compatible with standard HD video signals, including 1080/24p, 50p, 60p, 50i and 60i and it accepts both industry standard line-by-line and side-by-side 3D formats.
Specifications
- Power Requirements: AC120V/60Hz (US), AC220-240V/50+60Hz(EU)
- Resolution: 6,22 million dots (1920H x 1080V x RGB)
- Contrast ratio: 2,000 : 1 (Native), 10,000 : 1 (Dynamic)
- Y/C separation: (3D Y/C)
- Noise reduction function: (Digital NR/MPEG NR)
- Color temperature: Warm / Mid / Cool
- Dimensions With Tabletop Stand (W x H x D): 42.16 x 28.54 x 10.82 inches [1071 x 725 x 275mm]
- Net Weight With Tabletop Stand: 59.3 lbs [26.9kg]
- Viewable angle: 178 degrees from top, bottom, left and right
- Audio Power Output: 10W + 10W
- 3D compatible HDMI input: 3 terminals that support 1080/24p, 50p, 60p, 50i, 60i
- Accessories: 2 pairs of polarizing glasses
User Reviews (2)
Pros & Cons
-
2
extremely slim and attractive bezel
-
2
incredibly thin at only 1.5-inches
-
1
includes two pairs of 3D glasses
-
1
let's you use passive glasses which are very cheap, more comfortable, and produce less eye strain than active shutter technology
-
1
good format compatibility
-
1
poor value - very expensive for a technology with no media designed for it
-
1
bezel and stand are highly glossy - reflective and finger print magnets
-
1
Community Reviews
see more community reviews
From your Computer
From the Web
Comments (0)
helpful
Read the full review
You may also like...
